AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

AIME

pass@k, majority vote and Python tool access each shift this by double digits.

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2024-02-01
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Original sources

Reported results 10

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
Claude Opus 475.5percentextended thinking up to 64K tokens, top-p 0.95, no parallel test-time compute2025-05-22 · document_publicationClaude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 470.5percentextended thinking up to 64K tokens, top-p 0.95, no parallel test-time compute2025-05-22 · document_publicationClaude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4
DeepSeek-R179.8percentPass@12025-01-22 · document_publicationDeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek-V339.2percentPass@12024-12-27 · document_publicationDeepSeek-V3
Gemma 4 (31B)89.2percentno tools2026-03-11 · document_publicationGemma 4 (31B)
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B91.3percentthinking (temp 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20)2026-02-16 · document_publicationQwen3.5-397B-A17B
Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking)85.7percentthinking mode2025-05-14 · document_publicationQwen3
GLM-5.195.3percentAIME 2026, as reported2026-04-03 · document_publicationGLM-5.1
GLM-5.299.2percentAIME 2026, temp 1.0, top_p 0.95, max gen 163840 tokens, GPT-5.5 (medium) judge2026-06-16 · document_publicationGLM-5.2
GLM-592.7percentAIME 2026 I, temp 1.0, top_p 0.95, GPT-5.2 (medium) judge2026-02-11 · document_publicationGLM-5