AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

BioMysteryBench

Reported in two splits ("hard" and "human solved") that differ by more than 35 points, so a bare score is unreadable without its split. Anthropic notes its own safety refusals depress this number, which means the score mixes capability with policy. First-party to Anthropic, which built it and publishes the dataset. The task set was revised after an answer-key audit, so the item count moved and scores are not comparable across dataset versions.

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2026-04-29
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Original sources

Reported results 1

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
Hy4 preview71.3percentas printed in the report's benchmark table2026-08-28 · document_publicationHy4 preview