AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

BioMysteryBench

Reported in two splits ("hard" and "human solved") that differ by more than 35 points, so a bare score is unreadable without its split. Anthropic notes its own safety refusals depress this number, which means the score mixes capability with policy. First-party to Anthropic, which built it and publishes the dataset. The task set was revised after an answer-key audit, so the item count moved and scores are not comparable across dataset versions.

评测信息与证据

来源
Model reports
发布者
未收录
评测发布日期
2026-04-29
采集日期
未收录
模态
未收录

本站保留来源报告的结果,不代表独立复测。请先核对任务版本、评测协议、分数单位和报告日期;不同运行条件不能直接合并为统一排名。

原始资料

报告成绩 1

按来源中的观察顺序展示,顺序不代表排名。日期保留原始精度。

模型数值单位协议报告日期与口径来源
Hy4 preview71.3percentas printed in the report's benchmark table2026-08-28 · document_publicationHy4 preview