Six Navers Lab / Einsia benchmarks and the work they test
Compare the tasks, scoring and evidence behind six Einsia benchmarks, with complete Radar detail pages and original references.
Model reports
Evaluates one participant (T15), with about two thirds of 1,450 held-out sentences used for the private leaderboard. Speaking strategy, language model and corpus mix affect word error rate, so these scores are not directly comparable to Brain-to-Text '24.
This source record contains 6 numeric observations. The source distinguishes 6 model identities or configurations. A model may appear more than once; check the version, tools and run budget before comparing. Read results and row-level evidence →
These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.
Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.
| Model | Value | Unit | Protocol | Reported date and basis | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIT submission | 0.01773 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| EPFL-INL submission | 0.01663 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Infera-Neuro submission | 0.01537 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Stanford-NPTL causal RNN Ensemble + 5gram | 0.03892 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Stanford-NPTL causal RNN TTA-Ensemble + 5gram | 0.04817 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| UCD-NPL causal RNN + 5gram | 0.06999 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |