AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

Brain-to-Text '25

Evaluates one participant (T15), with about two thirds of 1,450 held-out sentences used for the private leaderboard. Speaking strategy, language model and corpus mix affect word error rate, so these scores are not directly comparable to Brain-to-Text '24.

Evidence available for this benchmark

This source record contains 6 numeric observations. The source distinguishes 6 model identities or configurations. A model may appear more than once; check the version, tools and run budget before comparing. Read results and row-level evidence →

Reported metric
word_error_rate
Recorded unit
ratio
Metric direction
lower is better

Start with these resources

Cited documents and dates (1)

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2025-07-07
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Reported results 6

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
BIT submission0.01773ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
EPFL-INL submission0.01663ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Infera-Neuro submission0.01537ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Stanford-NPTL causal RNN Ensemble + 5gram0.03892ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Stanford-NPTL causal RNN TTA-Ensemble + 5gram0.04817ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
UCD-NPL causal RNN + 5gram0.06999ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)