AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

Brain-to-Text '25

原始来源英文简介

Evaluates one participant (T15), with about two thirds of 1,450 held-out sentences used for the private leaderboard. Speaking strategy, language model and corpus mix affect word error rate, so these scores are not directly comparable to Brain-to-Text '24.

已收录的评测资料

这条来源记录收录了 6 条数值成绩。来源区分了 6 个模型身份或配置。同一模型可能有多条记录;比较前请核对具体版本、工具和运行预算。 查看成绩及逐条证据 →

报告指标
word_error_rate
原始单位
ratio
指标方向
数值越低越好

从这些资料开始

引用文档及日期(1)

评测信息与证据

来源
Model reports
发布者
未收录
评测发布日期
2025-07-07
采集日期
未收录
模态
未收录

本站保留来源报告的结果,不代表独立复测。请先核对任务版本、评测协议、分数单位和报告日期;不同运行条件不能直接合并为统一排名。

报告成绩 6

按来源中的观察顺序展示,顺序不代表排名。日期保留原始精度。

模型数值单位协议报告日期与口径来源
BIT submission0.01773ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
EPFL-INL submission0.01663ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Infera-Neuro submission0.01537ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Stanford-NPTL causal RNN Ensemble + 5gram0.03892ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
Stanford-NPTL causal RNN TTA-Ensemble + 5gram0.04817ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)
UCD-NPL causal RNN + 5gram0.06999ratioapproximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate2026-09-19 · document_publicationBrain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot)