Navers Lab / Einsia:六个评测分别测什么
按任务、评分和证据理解 Einsia 的六个评测,连接完整 Radar 详情与原始发布资料。
Model reports
原始来源英文简介
Evaluates one participant (T15), with about two thirds of 1,450 held-out sentences used for the private leaderboard. Speaking strategy, language model and corpus mix affect word error rate, so these scores are not directly comparable to Brain-to-Text '24.
这条来源记录收录了 6 条数值成绩。来源区分了 6 个模型身份或配置。同一模型可能有多条记录;比较前请核对具体版本、工具和运行预算。 查看成绩及逐条证据 →
本站保留来源报告的结果,不代表独立复测。请先核对任务版本、评测协议、分数单位和报告日期;不同运行条件不能直接合并为统一排名。
按来源中的观察顺序展示,顺序不代表排名。日期保留原始精度。
| 模型 | 数值 | 单位 | 协议 | 报告日期与口径 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIT submission | 0.01773 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| EPFL-INL submission | 0.01663 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Infera-Neuro submission | 0.01537 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Stanford-NPTL causal RNN Ensemble + 5gram | 0.03892 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| Stanford-NPTL causal RNN TTA-Ensemble + 5gram | 0.04817 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |
| UCD-NPL causal RNN + 5gram | 0.06999 | ratio | approximately 67% of 1,450 held-out test sentences; aggregate word error rate | 2026-09-19 · document_publication | Brain-to-Text '25 private leaderboard (2026-09-19 public snapshot) |