AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Claire Radar

τ^τ-Bench: An Environment for End-To-End, Realistic Agent Construction

Can a coding agent build a customer-service agent that works in deployment? Hyper-τ tests requirement discovery, implementation and operation under serving constraints.

Original September 2026 paper and the authors’ construction environment. This is different from τ-bench and τ²-bench.

What the developer receives

Business records, a simulated client, inherited code and a production API form the construction kit. Requirements must be recovered from evidence and conversation rather than handed over as a complete specification.

Original paper: methods and Table 2 · Authors’ executable environment and task definitions

How submissions are evaluated

The deliverable is an executable customer-service agent. Hidden simulated customer conversations evaluate its behavior after construction. Build time, build cost and serving cost are separate measurements.

Original paper: methods and Table 2

Task coverage

The release has 53 construction tasks: six airline, six retail, six telecom and 35 banking tasks. Overall scores average tasks, so banking has the greatest weight.

Original paper: methods and Table 2

Published results — original paper Table 2

Overall pass rates: GPT-5.6-sol / Codex 22.0%; GPT-5.6-terra / Codex 18.0%; Claude Opus 5 / Claude Code 23.9%; Claude Sonnet 5 / Claude Code 14.9%; Kimi K3 / Kimi Code 16.1%; Kimi K3 / OpenCode 17.9%. Expert-authored reference agents reach 82.2%. These are paper results, not independent reruns.

Original paper: methods and Table 2

How to interpret the comparison

A score belongs to a developer model plus its harness and budget. The expert reference is a ceiling, not another developer model. Simulated clients and domain imbalance limit generalization to live deployments.

Original paper: methods and Table 2

Inspect or reproduce the task

Use the authors’ repository for construction kits and the evaluation runtime. Construction runs require Docker and configured model access. Inspect a task and its serving constraints before comparing a new run with the paper.

Authors’ executable environment and task definitions

Published construction and deployment results

Each row describes a developer model and its harness. The expert reference is a separately authored agent, not another developer model.

Original paper Table 2 · 53 construction tasks
HarnessDeveloper / referenceOverall %Airline % (6)Retail % (6)Telecom % (6)Banking % (35)Build minutesBuild USDServing / budget
CodexGPT-5.6-sol (xhigh)22.049.859.232.99.047.918.20.45
CodexGPT-5.6-terra (xhigh)18.044.546.627.26.930.07.00.38
Claude CodeClaude Opus 5 (max)23.955.972.848.25.9216.342.00.58
Claude CodeClaude Sonnet 5 (max)14.941.950.221.13.2235.530.00.76
Kimi CodeKimi K3 (max)16.142.349.124.94.4205.713.50.72
OpenCodeKimi K3 (max)17.943.852.127.66.0360.315.10.61
—Expert-authored reference82.282.384.093.879.8——0.96

Overall averages the 53 tasks equally, rather than the four domains equally. The expert reference uses ground-truth access. Serving spend is a credit-budget ratio, not USD; missing reference build values stay unreported.

Original paper: methods and Table 2

Evidence available for this benchmark

The guide reproduces the paper's result tables with their separate tasks and metrics; these tables have not been added to normalized score data.

Start with these resources

Cited documents and dates (1)

Catalog collected on 2026-10-14; resources and fields reflect that saved source.

Recorded attention

Observed on: 2026-10-13

GitHub stars
39
Hugging Face paper upvotes
10
Star change · 30 days before observation
+19

sierra-research/hyper-tau-bench · View source snapshot

Dated attention observations, not live counts or benchmark scores.

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Claire Radar
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2026-09-04
Collected
2026-10-14
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Paper results 1

The guide above contains the paper's tables, retaining tasks, units, denominators and citations.