AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

MathVision

Prompt-format sensitive: vendors report boxed and unboxed variants and sometimes take the higher of the two.

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2024-02-22
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Original sources

Reported results 4

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
Gemma 4 (31B)85.6percentas reported2026-03-11 · document_publicationGemma 4 (31B)
Kimi K397.8percentreasoning=max, with Python2026-06-13 · document_publicationKimi K3
Kimi K394.3percentreasoning=max, without tools2026-06-13 · document_publicationKimi K3
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B88.6percentthinking (temp 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), fixed boxed prompt2026-02-16 · document_publicationQwen3.5-397B-A17B