AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

Morpheus Agent Benchmark

Can an agent turn a biology paper into a working tissue simulation? Fifteen published studies test whether generated models recover the mechanisms and biological behavior in the original papers.

Benchmark version 3; public code/data release 2.1.0 (2 November 2026). The two main runs began in October; the page review date is not an experiment date.

Rebuild a published biological model

The agent receives a paper, its extracted text, a focus prompt and a visual manifest. It writes MorpheusML XML, runs simulations, inspects outputs and revises the model within four hours. A separate evaluator assesses biological evidence against criteria tailored to that paper.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results

15 papers, two model cohorts

The main experiment has 225 GPT-6.1 Sol jobs (15 papers × five modes × three repetitions) and 375 GPT-6 Luna jobs (five repetitions). Subjects use max reasoning effort; the scoring model is GPT-6 Luna at high effort, with scorer v8 and criteria v7. The CSV supplies the 600 original run records.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results · All 600 published run records · Run-table column definitions

Tool access changes the experiment

Five setups separate general Python/web access, a simulator CLI, local documentation, a modeling skill and an MCP tool server. The Docs setup has no internet; the Web setup cannot invoke the simulator itself and receives a host-side execution afterward.

Published setup definitions
SetupCapabilities
1 · WebPython + web; host executes Morpheus afterward / Python + 网页,之后由主机执行
2 · CLIPython + web + Morpheus CLI / Python + 网页 + 模拟器命令行
3 · DocsPython + Morpheus CLI + staged docs; no internet / 本地文档,断网
4 · SkillPython + web + Morpheus CLI + skill / 增加建模技能
5 · MCPPython + web + Morpheus CLI + skill + MCP / 增加 MCP 工具

These are protocols, not different benchmark datasets.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results

Biological fidelity, not merely running code

The primary measurement is a fraction from zero to one: passed criterion weight divided by total weight. The v7 rubric gives qualitative and numerical categories equal total weight. The agent's own 0–8 reproduction score and the host's 0–7 executability score are separate diagnostics and are not the preprint evaluation.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results

The published headline uses four modes

The README prints mean biological score across all 15 papers and the four Morpheus-enabled modes. The Python/web-only baseline is excluded from this aggregate. We preserve these printed values instead of inventing an all-five-mode headline or converting them to percentages.

README · four-mode aggregate
ModelMean biological score (0–1)Mean API-equivalent cost per run
gpt-6.1-sol0.850US$3.74
gpt-6-luna0.663US$0.32

Cost is the paper's run-cost estimate, not a current price quote. Repetition counts differ.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results

Two directly printed mode examples

The README also gives the two mode-specific means below. These are narrower protocol slices and must not be ranked against the pooled four-mode headline as though they were the same experiment. All 600 raw run records and the authors' analysis scripts are linked for further inspection; Radar has not rerun the model jobs.

README · illustrative mode means
ModelSetupMean biological score (0–1)
gpt-6.1-solMCP0.862
gpt-6-lunaPython + web0.108

These are the two examples explicitly printed in the README; no omitted mode mean is guessed.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results · All 600 published run records

A bounded scientific-reproduction test

This is a 15-paper simulation benchmark, not evidence that an agent can perform wet-lab research or that every simulated mechanism is biologically correct. Results depend on tool access, repetition count, time budget and an LLM judge. The judge shares a model family with one evaluated subject; manual-score comparison data are provided, but do not remove all judge uncertainty.

Pinned author README · methods and printed results · Original Figure 2 evidence and manual comparison

Code, results and release history

The authors call 2.0.0 (27 October) the first public code release. Version 2.1.0 adds figure/data packages while leaving the subject-facing version-3 setup unchanged. Code and per-run result CSVs are public. Complete transcripts, workspaces and all logs are available on request rather than included in this release; four input papers require separate acquisition.

Author code/data release 2.1.0 · First public code release 2.0.0 · Pinned author README · methods and printed results

Original publication

Author repository and pinned release 2.1.0; benchmark setup version 3.

Reviewed 2026-11-03

Evidence available for this benchmark

This source record contains 2 numeric observations. The source distinguishes 2 model identities or configurations. A model may appear more than once; check the version, tools and run budget before comparing. Read results and row-level evidence →

Reported metric
mean biological score over four Morpheus modes
Recorded unit
score
Metric direction
higher is better

Start with these resources

Cited documents and dates (1)

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2026-10-27
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Reported results 2

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
gpt-6.1-sol0.85scoreAuthors' README v2.1.0 printed aggregate; all 15 papers pooled over morpheus_cli, morpheus_cli_docs, morpheus_skill and morpheus_mcp; Python/web-only mode excluded; 3 repetitions per paper/mode; subject reasoning max; 4-hour budget per job; run folder 20261007_202940_benchmark; Morpheus 2.4.1; independent gpt-6-luna high judge, scorer v8, criteria v7; weighted passed-criterion fraction in [0,1]; exact provider revision unspecified2026-11-02 · document_publicationMorpheus Agent Benchmark v2.1.0 · published README results
gpt-6-luna0.663scoreAuthors' README v2.1.0 printed aggregate; all 15 papers pooled over morpheus_cli, morpheus_cli_docs, morpheus_skill and morpheus_mcp; Python/web-only mode excluded; 5 repetitions per paper/mode; subject reasoning max; 4-hour budget per job; run folder 20261003_005649_benchmark; Morpheus 2.4.1; independent gpt-6-luna high judge, scorer v8, criteria v7; weighted passed-criterion fraction in [0,1]; exact provider revision unspecified2026-11-02 · document_publicationMorpheus Agent Benchmark v2.1.0 · published README results