AI EVALUATION, IN CONTEXT.BY EQUALITY MACHINE

Model reports

SWE-bench Pro

Harness and split version must be recorded with any score.

Evaluation context and evidence

Source
Model reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Benchmark release
2025-09-23
Collected
Not recorded
Modality
Not recorded

These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.

Original sources

Reported results 10

Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.

ModelValueUnitProtocolReported date and basisSource
Claude Opus 579.2percentadaptive thinking, max effort, averaged over 5 trials2026-07-24 · document_publicationClaude Opus 5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro52.1percentnon-think, resolved2026-04-22 · document_publicationDeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek-V4-Pro54.4percentthink high, resolved2026-04-22 · document_publicationDeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek-V4-Pro55.4percentthink max, resolved2026-04-22 · document_publicationDeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeepSeek-V4-Flash52.6percentthink max, resolved2026-06-25 · document_publicationDeepSeek-V4
Gemini 3.1 Pro54.2percentThinking (High), Single attempt2026-02-19 · document_publicationGemini 3.1 Pro
Hy4 preview65.7percentpublic split2026-08-28 · document_publicationHy4 preview
Grok 4.564.7percentresolve rate2026-07-08 · document_publicationGrok 4.5
GLM-5.158.4percentas reported2026-04-03 · document_publicationGLM-5.1
GLM-5.262.1percentOpenHands, tailored instruction prompt, temp 1, top_p 1, max_new_tokens 32k, 400K context2026-06-16 · document_publicationGLM-5.2