AI benchmarks and leaderboards are different things
Learn the difference between a benchmark, an evaluation run and a leaderboard, and use each to answer the right question.
Model reports
Harness and split version must be recorded with any score.
These are source-reported observations, not independent reruns by this site. Check the task version, evaluation protocol, unit and reporting date before comparing models. Results from different setups are not a universal ranking.
Shown in source observation order, not ranked. Dates retain the precision provided by the source.
| Model | Value | Unit | Protocol | Reported date and basis | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 79.2 | percent | adaptive thinking, max effort, averaged over 5 trials | 2026-07-24 · document_publication | Claude Opus 5 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | 52.1 | percent | non-think, resolved | 2026-04-22 · document_publication | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | 54.4 | percent | think high, resolved | 2026-04-22 · document_publication | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | 55.4 | percent | think max, resolved | 2026-04-22 · document_publication | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flash | 52.6 | percent | think max, resolved | 2026-06-25 · document_publication | DeepSeek-V4 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | 54.2 | percent | Thinking (High), Single attempt | 2026-02-19 · document_publication | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Hy4 preview | 65.7 | percent | public split | 2026-08-28 · document_publication | Hy4 preview |
| Grok 4.5 | 64.7 | percent | resolve rate | 2026-07-08 · document_publication | Grok 4.5 |
| GLM-5.1 | 58.4 | percent | as reported | 2026-04-03 · document_publication | GLM-5.1 |
| GLM-5.2 | 62.1 | percent | OpenHands, tailored instruction prompt, temp 1, top_p 1, max_new_tokens 32k, 400K context | 2026-06-16 · document_publication | GLM-5.2 |